047 - "Truthful Not Misleading" with Darshan Kulkarni

Let's Combinate · 24 Aug 2022 · 1h 00m

What this episode covers

Darshan Kulkarni, an FDA regulatory attorney and Adjunct Law Professor at Drexel University, explains the distinction between regulatory and legal compliance in the life sciences industry. He details how the First Amendment influences US promotional compliance, particularly regarding off-label speech and the 'truthful not misleading' standard established by recent court cases. Kulkarni also discusses the operational differences between FDA divisions for drugs (OPDP) and devices (CDRH), noting the latter's limited enforcement resources, and highlights the implications of the Sunshine Act on physician interactions.

Mentioned

Companies
Kulkarni Law Firm
Products
Saras
Also
Drexel University, Thomas Jefferson University, FDA, OIG, DOJ, Sunshine Act, OPDP, CDRH

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 1h 26m

    Ad Promo and The Difference in Regulatory & Legal

    Mark DuVal, founder of Duval & Associates, explains the '4 buckets' framework for medical device promotion: on-label promotion, off-label dissemination, off-label communication, and the emerging fourth bucket of off-label promotion with disclosures. He contrasts the scientific perspective of regulatory affairs professionals with the advocacy-driven approach of regulatory attorneys, emphasizing the legal tension between FDA enforcement and First Amendment rights established in cases like *Howard Root* and *Washington Legal Foundation*. DuVal details how companies can navigate these boundaries using guidance documents, ensuring all communications are 'truthful, not misleading, and fairly balanced,' while managing risks like strict liability for executives and compliance monitoring of contract sales forces.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 55m

    #366: Cardiac Arrest: Five Heart-Stopping Years as a CEO on the Feds Hit-List

    Howard Root, former CEO of Vascular Solutions, and Mark DuVal, President of DuVal & Associates, discuss Root's five-year federal criminal trial for alleged off-label promotion of a vascular device. Root details how a disgruntled whistleblower triggered a DOJ investigation into a product representing only 0.1% of sales, leading to a $25 million legal battle and the application of the Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine. DuVal explains the legal precedents, including the First Amendment protections for truthful speech, that ultimately led to Root's acquittal and shifted industry regulatory strategies. The episode highlights the critical importance of robust compliance programs, careful hiring practices, and maintaining a 'gray area' in corporate policy to avoid becoming a target for aggressive prosecutors.

  • The Startup CPG Podcast · 57m

    #216 - Food Labeling Law 101 with Lauren Handel

    Lauren Handel, founder of Handel Food Law, explains the regulatory framework and litigation risks for CPG brands, distinguishing between FDA-regulated foods and USDA-regulated products. She details specific claim categories including nutrient content, 'natural,' 'organic,' and health benefits, emphasizing that consistency across packaging, websites, and advertising is essential to avoid costly class-action lawsuits. Handel advises founders to understand the difference between regulatory consultants and attorneys, noting that legal advice offers privilege and risk assessment that consultants cannot provide, while recommending third-party certifications to mitigate exposure to litigation.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 40m

    How Jon Speer Met His Most Frequent Guest: Mike Drues

    Jon Speer, host of the Global Medical Device Podcast and founder of Greenlight Guru, revisits his 2014 origin story with Mike Drues, president of Vascular Sciences, to discuss their past debates on medical device design controls. They analyze the tension between following the literal letter of FDA regulations versus understanding their intent, arguing that many companies fail because they treat compliance as a checkbox exercise rather than a rigorous engineering process. The conversation highlights the danger of assuming users know their own needs, which stifles revolutionary product development in favor of evolutionary improvements, and emphasizes the critical importance of validating validation methods and addressing off-label use in risk management.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 37m

    Part 1: The Theranos Loophole & Lab Developed Tests

    Mike Drues, president of Vascular Sciences, explains the regulatory distinction between Lab Developed Tests (LDTs) and In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs), noting that LDTs are currently exempt from FDA pre-market review under the guise of the 'practice of medicine.' He argues that this loophole, highlighted by the Theranos case, allows companies to bypass rigorous safety and efficacy testing, creating a double standard where hospitals face no oversight for modifying commercial devices while manufacturers do. Drues emphasizes that the VALID Act, which would bring LDTs under FDA jurisdiction, has been stalled in Congress despite bipartisan support, leaving a significant regulatory gap that risks patient safety.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.