025 - “The Frying Pan to the Fire” with Edwin Bills

Let's Combinate · 23 Mar 2022 · 1h 31m

What this episode covers

Edwin Bills, a Risk Management Expert and former committee member for ISO 14971, ISO TR 24971, and AAMI TIR 105, explains the evolution of risk management standards in medical devices and combination products. He details the philosophical differences between ISO 14971 and ICH Q9, emphasizing that risk management must focus on patient safety rather than just regulatory compliance. Bills advises engineers to use qualitative methods early in development and highlights the importance of analyzing interactions between drug and device constituents in combination products. He also discusses the expanded requirements for post-market surveillance in the 2019 standard and the upcoming harmonization of ISO 14971 in Europe.

Mentioned

Also
ISO 14971, ISO TR 24971, AAMI TIR 105, ICH Q9, EN 1441, IEC 60601, UL 544, ISO 14155, TR 48, ISO 31000

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 40m

    Inside Look into ISO 14971:2019 & ISO TR 24971:2020 from the Author's Point of View

    Ed Bills, a risk management consultant and technical committee member for ISO 14971:2019 and ISO TR 24971:2020, joins host Jon Speer to explain the nuances of the updated international medical device risk management standards. They discuss the separation of guidance from requirements, the critical role of post-market surveillance in Clause 10, and the regulatory landscape involving the EU MDR and IVDR. Bills emphasizes that risk management is a product safety standard distinct from business or project risk, and advises companies to read the full rationale and technical report to avoid common misinterpretations.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 1h 03m

    #422: ISO 14971 and the Road to Risk Management with Edwin Bills

    Edwin Bills, a lead expert in medical device risk management and key contributor to ISO 14971, explains how his background as a submariner and manufacturing quality engineer informs his approach to patient safety and cost of quality. He details the critical link between manufacturing process capability (CPK), supplier quality, and financial risk, arguing that quality failures directly impact a company's bottom line and reputation. Bills critiques common industry practices, such as late-stage FMEA and manual spreadsheet-based traceability, advocating for early hazard analysis, industrial statistics, and integrated software solutions to manage complex risks in medical devices and combination products.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 37m

    #445: ISO 10993-1:2025: What Risk-Based Biocompatibility Means for MedTech

    Thor Rollins, a leader at Nelson Labs and convener of the ISO committee revising ISO 10933-1, explains the 2025 standard's shift from checkbox testing to a risk-based approach aligned with ISO 14971. He details new requirements for lifecycle evaluation, particularly for reprocessed devices, and the concept of biological equivalence to reduce redundant testing. Rollins also discusses the US's rejection of the draft due to lack of guidance, the upcoming technical specifications, and practical advice for companies at different stages of development.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 36m

    #325 The Role of dFMEAs in Risk Management for Medical Devices

    Wade Schroeder, a medical device expert at Greenlight Guru, explains how dFMEA and ISO 14971 work together to manage risk in medical device design. He argues that while dFMEA provides a useful bottom-up technical view, ISO 14971 offers a necessary top-down, patient-focused strategy that maps directly to FDA expectations. Schroeder highlights Greenlight Guru’s software as a tool that integrates risk management with design controls, reducing the complexity of maintaining separate systems. The discussion emphasizes using tools like fault tree analysis and fishbone diagrams to ensure comprehensive safety without compromising regulatory compliance.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 29m

    #418: Biocompatibility Brief - What Medical Device Companies Need to Know

    Marina Daineko, a MedTech expert and chemist specializing in biological evaluations, explains the critical importance of integrating biocompatibility into a company's Quality Management System (QMS) rather than treating it as an isolated task. She details the necessity of analyzing raw data, such as the silver ion cytotoxicity anomaly, and distinguishing between extractables and leachables to assess cumulative risks for long-term implanted devices like the Ishur contraceptive. Daineko emphasizes that the revised ISO 10993-1 standard drives a shift from reactive testing to proactive risk assessment, requiring cross-functional communication to ensure patient safety throughout the device lifecycle.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.