012 - "Asking then Seeing" with Sara Waxberg Mcnew

Let's Combinate · 22 Dec 2021 · 1h 16m

What this episode covers

Sara Waxberg McNew, Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science, explains the human factors process for medical devices, emphasizing the distinction between formative studies and summative validation. She details how to interpret ANSI/AAMI HE75 and IEC 62366-1 standards, manage risk for combination products, and handle regulatory submissions with the FDA. The discussion covers specific challenges like testing rare patient populations, using surrogates, and conducting threshold analyses for generics.

Mentioned

Companies
Design Science, Eli Lilly and Company, Philips Healthcare, Baxter Healthcare
Also
Tufts University, ANSI/AAMI HE75:2009 (R2018), IEC 62366-1:2015, FDA

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 53m

    #450: Human Factors vs. Clinical Trials: Why Your MedTech Submission is Stalling

    Staci Miller, a Human Factors and UX Strategist at GenUX, explains why medical device submissions stall when human factors (HF) is treated as a late-stage box-checking exercise rather than an integrated part of ISO 14971 risk management. She distinguishes between Use-Related Risk Analysis (URRA) for novel devices and User Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (uFMEA) for established products with post-market data, emphasizing that clinical trial efficacy data cannot replace usability validation unless premeditated in the study protocol. Miller warns that ignoring the 'use environment' and design inputs leads to FDA rejections, as regulators require a cohesive safety story that maps user interactions across diverse contexts like ambulances or radiology suites.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 36m

    Setting the Record Straight on Usability & Human Factors

    Mike Drues, a regulatory consultant for Vascular Sciences, joins host Jon Speer to clarify the distinction between usability and human factors in medical device development. They discuss how engineers often fail to test devices on actual end-users, leading to design flaws, and argue that FDA regulations are inconsistent, requiring extensive testing for simple devices while ignoring complex ones. The conversation emphasizes that usability testing should be risk-based, distinguishing between formative testing during development and summative testing after design freeze. Drues highlights the importance of realistic testing scenarios and warns against the 'tick-box' mentality that ignores off-label use risks.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 50m

    #332: Regulatory Strategy and the Advantage of Diversity in MedTech

    Nada Hanafi, SVP of Regulatory Strategy at Veranex and co-founder of Medtech Color, discusses the critical importance of diversity in medical device design and regulatory strategy. She highlights how historical biases in validation, such as pulse oximeters failing on darker skin tones due to testing on Caucasian men, led to dire health outcomes. Hanafi explains how the FDA has evolved to prioritize transparency, health equity, and user-centered design, urging companies to define clear intended use and indications for use early in the development process. She emphasizes that incorporating diverse patient perspectives and data into AI training and clinical trials is no longer optional but a regulatory requirement for safety and efficacy.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 25m

    Why Usability Matters

    Michaela Kauer-Franz, CEO of Custom Medical, joins host Jon Speer to discuss the critical role of usability engineering in medical device development. They define the distinction between formative evaluations, which guide design direction, and summative evaluations, which prove safety with production units. Kauer-Franz highlights common industry mistakes, such as starting usability testing too late or relying solely on key opinion leaders rather than the broader user base.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 40m

    Human Factors & Risk Management: What's Needed & Why?

    Shannon Hoste, President of Agilis Consulting Group and former lead of the FDA’s Human Factors Team, explains how human factors serves as a critical risk management activity for medical device development. She details the importance of the Use-Related Risk Assessment (URRA) in identifying potential use errors and high-disparity harms early in the design process to ensure safe and effective product use. Hoste discusses the evolution of ISO 62366, the challenges engineers face in understanding qualitative user needs, and the necessity of integrating human factors into the product development lifecycle rather than treating it as a late-stage compliance checkbox.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.