Comparing FDA’s Breakthrough Devices Program & Safer Technologies Program

Global Medical Device Podcast · 11 May 2021 · 41m · Episode 203

What this episode covers

Isabella Schmitt, Director of Regulatory Affairs at Proxima Clinical Research, explains the differences between the FDA’s Breakthrough Devices Program (BDP) and the Safer Technologies Program (STeP). She details how BDP targets life-threatening conditions with potential for improved efficacy, while STeP focuses on safety benefits for less serious conditions. Schmitt highlights the strategic importance of the indication statement in determining eligibility and warns that these designations can raise the FDA's scrutiny bar for clearance.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Being an Engineer · 51m

    S6E19 Stuart Grant | MedTech Innovation

    Dr. Stuart Grant, founder of Archetype MedTech, discusses his 25-year career at Johnson & Johnson and DePuy Synthes before launching his consultancy to help startups navigate medical device development. He details the challenges of securing funding, managing regulatory differences between the EU's MDR and the US FDA, and the strategic importance of narrow clinical indications. Grant also explores future trends in surgical robotics and AI, emphasizing the need for modular platforms and the value of accumulated engineering knowledge.

  • Let's Combinate · 34m

    117 - Post Market Surveillance, Safety Reporting, Databases, Platforms Health Hazards Assessments and Product Responsibilities with Khaudeja Bano

    Khaudeja Bano, VP of Quality for Combination Products at Amgen, discusses post-market surveillance and safety reporting requirements for combination products under 21 CFR Part 4B. She explains the distinction between primary mode of action reporting (e.g., FAERS for drugs) and device-specific reporting, the importance of cross-functional teams in risk management, and strategies for handling platform-based products. Bano also details the complexities of international reporting timelines, such as 24-hour requirements in China, and the role of Health Hazard Evaluations in determining corrective actions.

  • Let's Combinate · 33m

    106 - FOIA, FDA Modernizing 510(k) Program, De Novo Submissions, and more databases with Michelle Lott

    Michelle Lott, founder of leanRAQA, explains how to navigate eight FDA databases, including using FOIA requests to access redacted 510(k) summaries and reviewing 483 and Warning Letter databases to identify regulatory trends. She details the recent modernization of the 510(k) program, specifically new guidance on predicate selection and clinical data, and contrasts the 510(k) pathway with the De Novo process for novel devices. Lott also outlines the Pre-Submission and 513(g) classification processes, noting their timelines and costs, while advising companies to monitor draft guidance documents to anticipate FDA expectations during submissions.

  • Let's Combinate · 1h 03m

    021 - "Options" with Karandeep Singh Badwal

    Karandeep Singh Badwal, a QA/RA consultant and host of The MedTech Podcast, explains how defining 'intended use' determines whether a product is a regulated medical device or unregulated software, a critical distinction for startups. He details the specific regulatory challenges of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), including cybersecurity, GDPR compliance, and the impact of the EU MDR on software classification. Badwal also discusses the strategic advantages for UK software companies post-Brexit, where they can still self-certify as Class 1 devices while EU counterparts face stricter notified body audits.

  • Let's Combinate · 32m

    204 - The Dictionary & Thesaurus of Combination Products (Finally Explained) with Susan Neadle

    Susan Neadle, Principal Consultant at Combination Products Consulting Services LLC and author of The Combination Products Handbook, explains the persistent regulatory confusion surrounding terminology in drug-device combination products. She details how terms like 'platform,' 'component,' and 'CAPA' are interpreted differently between pharmaceutical and medical device frameworks, creating significant compliance risks. The discussion highlights the failure of ASTM standards to align global definitions and emphasizes the need for a science- and risk-based approach to navigate these discrepancies.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Global Medical Device Podcast. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.