117 - Post Market Surveillance, Safety Reporting, Databases, Platforms Health Hazards Assessments and Product Responsibilities with Khaudeja Bano

Let's Combinate · 3 Jan 2024 · 34m

What this episode covers

Khaudeja Bano, VP of Quality for Combination Products at Amgen, discusses post-market surveillance and safety reporting requirements for combination products under 21 CFR Part 4B. She explains the distinction between primary mode of action reporting (e.g., FAERS for drugs) and device-specific reporting, the importance of cross-functional teams in risk management, and strategies for handling platform-based products. Bano also details the complexities of international reporting timelines, such as 24-hour requirements in China, and the role of Health Hazard Evaluations in determining corrective actions.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 34m

    Understanding and Handling Different Types of Feedback

    Isabella Schmitt, Director of Regulatory Affairs at Proxima Clinical Research, explains the regulatory distinctions between product feedback, complaints, and adverse events for medical device companies. She details the criteria for classifying complaints under 21 CFR 820, the strict timelines for filing Medical Device Reports (MDRs) with the FDA for deaths or serious injuries, and the importance of proactive monitoring via databases like MAUDE. Schmitt emphasizes that all staff must be trained to capture feedback to ensure qualified personnel can determine if an event requires investigation or root cause analysis.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 35m

    #467: Combination Product Compliance: PMOA, 21 CFR Part 4 & QMS Alignment

    Jim Fentress, Director of Regulatory Affairs at Galero (a Santa Group company), explains the regulatory complexities of combination products, focusing on how the Primary Mode of Action (PMOA) dictates FDA oversight. He details the challenges pharmaceutical companies face when integrating device Quality Management Systems (QMSR/ISO 13485) into their existing CGMP frameworks under 21 CFR Part 4. The discussion covers specific friction points like risk management alignment (AAMI TIR105 vs. ICH Q9), labeling classifications, and the critical need for transparent change control protocols between device manufacturers and pharma partners.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 50m

    #410: Is the MAUDE Database Broken? An Insider’s Take on Adverse Event Reporting Failures

    Regulatory expert Mike Drues joins host Etienne Nichols to critique the FDA’s MAUDE database, arguing that widespread late reporting and poor data hygiene undermine its safety mission. Drues highlights that nearly 30% of reports are late, with major manufacturers like Medtronic, Becton Dickinson, and Dexcom accounting for a disproportionate share of violations. The discussion covers the legal risks of non-compliance, the misuse of MAUDE data for competitive analysis, and recommendations for modernizing the system with AI-driven cross-referencing and tiered reporting urgency.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 38m

    #380: Navigating the Complex World of Combination Products with Subhi Saadeh

    Subhi Saadeh, host of the Combinate Podcast and expert in combination products, discusses the regulatory complexities of integrating drugs, devices, and biologics, including the differences between US FDA and EU regulatory pathways. He explains the definitions of single entity, co-packaged, and cross-labeled products, and addresses common misconceptions about the differences between drug and device quality systems. Saadeh also shares his journey of starting the podcast to maintain consistent learning and production, highlighting the importance of lifelong learning and leveraging coaching to balance technical and business aspects of the MedTech industry.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 40m

    #365: Medical Device Reporting: The Do's and Don'ts

    Lisa Van Ryn, a medical device guru at Greenlight Guru, explains the FDA’s Medical Device Reporting (MDR) requirements, detailing how manufacturers must evaluate complaints to determine reportability under 21 CFR Part 803. She outlines a decision tree for identifying serious injuries and device malfunctions, emphasizing that the reporting clock starts when any company employee becomes aware of an event, not just quality staff. Van Ryn highlights the distinction between 5-day and 30-day reports based on the need for remedial action to prevent public health risks, and warns against the pitfalls of ignoring customer feedback for trend analysis.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.