106 - FOIA, FDA Modernizing 510(k) Program, De Novo Submissions, and more databases with Michelle Lott

Let's Combinate · 24 Oct 2023 · 33m

What this episode covers

Michelle Lott, founder of leanRAQA, explains how to navigate eight FDA databases, including using FOIA requests to access redacted 510(k) summaries and reviewing 483 and Warning Letter databases to identify regulatory trends. She details the recent modernization of the 510(k) program, specifically new guidance on predicate selection and clinical data, and contrasts the 510(k) pathway with the De Novo process for novel devices. Lott also outlines the Pre-Submission and 513(g) classification processes, noting their timelines and costs, while advising companies to monitor draft guidance documents to anticipate FDA expectations during submissions.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 37m

    Demystifying the De Novo Process

    Rob MacCuspie, Manager of Regulatory Affairs at Proxima CRO, explains the De Novo pathway for novel medical devices that lack a substantial equivalent predicate. He contrasts this with 510(k) and PMA submissions, highlighting that De Novo allows innovators to set regulatory standards and special controls for future competitors. MacCuspie advises companies to use pre-submission meetings to align with the FDA, avoid analysis paralysis by launching version 1 products, and focus on patient benefit rather than just compliance.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 38m

    #342: Planning an FDA Submission

    Ellie Reynolds, Associate Director of Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs at Proxima Clinical Research, explains the strategic planning required for FDA medical device submissions. She details the differences between 510(k), De Novo, and PMA pathways, emphasizing the critical role of Q-submissions (pre-submissions) and the eSTAR system in identifying documentation gaps early. Reynolds highlights the importance of realistic timeline management, including the 60-75 day wait for pre-sub meetings and potential review pauses, as well as navigating user fees and building collaborative relationships with FDA review teams.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 47m

    #346: FDAs eSTAR Program

    Patrick Axtell from the FDA, along with Lisa Pritchard and Kathy Herzog from DuVal & Associates, discuss the mandatory eSTAR program for 510(k) submissions. They explain how the standardized template automates data collection, integrates guidance documents, and eliminates the Refuse to Accept (RTA) checklist to streamline reviews. The experts share strategies for building advocacy through the executive summary and managing attachments offline to avoid common pitfalls like missing content or formatting errors.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 43m

    510(k) Tips and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions for Medical Device Companies

    Mike Drues, president of Vascular Sciences, joins host Jon Speer to explain the 510(k) regulatory pathway for Class II medical devices, emphasizing the requirements for substantial equivalence and device classification. They discuss the three types of 510(k) submissions—Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated—and advise on timing, noting that design freeze and verification/validation testing must be complete before submission, with promissory notes being rarely accepted today. The conversation highlights the importance of clinical evidence based on the totality of evidence rather than pathway type, and details the Refuse to Accept (RTA) administrative review process, urging companies to use RTA checklists to avoid common paperwork errors.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 38m

    How to Choose the Right FDA Regulatory Pathway for your Device

    Mike Drues of Vascular Sciences joins host John Spear to explain that medical device companies have 7 major FDA regulatory pathways, including 510(k), PMA, De Novo, HDE, PDP, CDE, and EAP, rather than just the two commonly known options. Drues details how classification depends on both technology and labeling, allowing companies to 'wordsmith' claims to access different routes, such as using a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) for narrow patient populations or a Custom Device Exemption (CDE) for personalized 3D-printed devices. The discussion highlights strategic combinations, such as using an Emergency Access Program (EAP) for early feasibility data before a full PMA, or pursuing anatomy-specific pathways for the same device. Drues also clarifies that programs like Breakthrough Devices Program (BDP) and Safer Technologies Program (STEP) are not standalone pathways but efficiency accelerators for standard submissions.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.