Understanding the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Process

Global Medical Device Podcast · 31 Mar 2021 · 57m · Episode 192

What this episode covers

David Pudwill, known as 'Mr. Regulatory,' explains the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) process to Jon Speer, detailing when an IDE is required, the distinction between exempt, non-significant risk, and significant risk studies, and the specific contents of an IDE application. Pudwill emphasizes that while 510(k) devices often don't require clinical data, high-risk or novel devices likely will, and he outlines the 12 mandatory components of an IDE submission and the FDA's 30-day review timeline. The conversation covers strategic advice on using Q-Submissions to clarify risk determinations, managing IRB interactions, and navigating post-approval reporting requirements to ensure a smooth path to market.

Mentioned

Companies
Greenlight Guru
Also
FDA, Mr. Regulatory, David Pudwill, Jon Speer, Green Light Guru Academy, 21 CFR Part 812, Q-Submission Program, 510(k), PMA, De Novo, IRB

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Let's Combinate · 33m

    106 - FOIA, FDA Modernizing 510(k) Program, De Novo Submissions, and more databases with Michelle Lott

    Michelle Lott, founder of leanRAQA, explains how to navigate eight FDA databases, including using FOIA requests to access redacted 510(k) summaries and reviewing 483 and Warning Letter databases to identify regulatory trends. She details the recent modernization of the 510(k) program, specifically new guidance on predicate selection and clinical data, and contrasts the 510(k) pathway with the De Novo process for novel devices. Lott also outlines the Pre-Submission and 513(g) classification processes, noting their timelines and costs, while advising companies to monitor draft guidance documents to anticipate FDA expectations during submissions.

  • Let's Combinate · 1h 16m

    012 - "Asking then Seeing" with Sara Waxberg Mcnew

    Sara Waxberg McNew, Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science, explains the human factors process for medical devices, emphasizing the distinction between formative studies and summative validation. She details how to interpret ANSI/AAMI HE75 and IEC 62366-1 standards, manage risk for combination products, and handle regulatory submissions with the FDA. The discussion covers specific challenges like testing rare patient populations, using surrogates, and conducting threshold analyses for generics.

  • Let's Combinate · 35m

    079 - How FDA Reviews Combination Products, Policy, EPR's, and Harmonization with Rumi Young

    Rumi Young, Director of Regulatory Policy at Becton Dickinson (BD), explains how the FDA reviews combination products, drawing on her previous tenure as Acting Assistant Director in CDRH’s Division of Drug Delivery. She details the inter-center consult process for products like auto-injectors and smart connected devices, highlighting the manual nature of current submissions and the critical need for clear device identification in NDAs and BLAs. Young discusses the role of industry in shaping policy, advocating for updated Essential Performance Requirements (EPRs) and international harmonization through IMDRF to address the gap between evolving technologies and outdated guidances.

  • Let's Combinate · 22m

    077 - 8 Databases and How To Use Them with Michelle Lott

    Michelle Lott, founder of leanRAQA, walks through eight critical FDA databases for medical device regulatory strategy, including the Product Classification Database, 510(k) Database, and Registration and Listing Database. She explains how to use these tools to determine submission types, identify competitors, and access redacted technical data via FOIA requests. Lott also highlights the importance of the Guidance Document Database and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for understanding specific regulatory requirements and consensus standards.

  • Let's Combinate · 36m

    104 -New FDA Guidance, HF vs. Design Validation, Critical Tasks & Pre-IND HF Studies with Sara McNew

    Sara McNew, Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science, discusses the new FDA Guidance on Human Factors for Combination Products, clarifying the distinction between human factors validation and broader design validation. She explains that pre-IND studies must demonstrate that clinical trial participants can use the device correctly to ensure accurate pharmacokinetic data, requiring a hybrid of formative and summative rigor. McNew details how critical task definitions now include administration and dosing errors, not just serious harm, and emphasizes the importance of submitting comprehensive Use Related Risk Assessments (URRA) alongside HF summaries.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Global Medical Device Podcast. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.