Signature Verification in the Vote-By-Mail Era

EE Times Current · 13 Nov 2020 · 59m

AI in practice: 5 real uses of AI described

What this episode covers

Greg Counsel, Vice President of Marketing and Product Management at Pariscript, explains how the company's AI-based signature verification software assists election officials in processing mail-in ballots by automating the first pass of signature matching while relying on human review for edge cases. Policy expert Porsche Allen Kyle, of the ACLU Campaign for Smart Justice, discusses the civil rights implications of this technology, highlighting concerns about algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and the potential for disproportionate rejection rates among minority and younger voters. The episode contrasts the technical capabilities of Pariscript's system, which uses neural networks and orthogonal algorithms, with the regulatory void surrounding its use in elections, arguing for stricter oversight and transparency to prevent disenfranchisement.

AI in practice

Where this conversation describes AI being used to build or deliver a product. Part of the AI in practice tracker.

Engineering & simulationPariscript signature verification software

The software uses machine learning and neural networks to analyze signature features and compare them against reference signatures, enabling automated first-pass verification of ballots.

“The company is branched out into document processing systems for clients in a variety of industries, including banking and insurance. Voter ballots are just another kind of document, and the company's long history with handwriting analysis, came in handy for performing signature verification for election boards.”

Speaker 1 · Hear it at 2:21

Engineering & simulationPariscript software (new release)

A software update was released to enhance low-resolution images and adjust DPI differences, allowing the system to compare signatures of different qualities by correcting for resolution loss.

“Now, you can use machine learning to correct for that as well. So what we did earlier this year is have a new release of our software, which will actually enhance the image, but also adjust down and basically make a take an apples to orange issue where we've got 2 images at different DPIs and correct for that so that we can do a like for like.”

Speaker 4 · Hear it at 10:39

Engineering & simulationPariscript proprietary algorithms

The engineering team blends multiple orthogonal machine learning algorithms, including deep learning neural networks and computer vision techniques, to identify precise signature features and determine authenticity.

“So what they did is they blended a number of them, they like to use the word orthogonal, or, you know, it's as if you're using a number of different experts, each with their own opinions, and then on top of that, we have some voting algorithms that will then take all of these independent opinions and identify the most precise one or the most precise answer.”

Speaker 4 · Hear it at 17:10

Engineering & simulationPariscript software70-75% automation rate, 98% accuracy

The software is trained on specific DPI ranges (200-300) and uses a reject curve to balance automation rates against error rates, achieving 70-75% automation with 98% accuracy.

“So for instance, within our own data sets, we have, we can achieve about a 70 to 75% automation rate holding at about a 98% accuracy rate or 2% error. And, you know, that error rate can be, you know, halved. Of course, there's a corresponding reduction in the amount of automation…”

Speaker 4 · Hear it at 23:56

Running the companyPariscript software

The system processes ballots as a first-pass automation tool, automatically processing easy cases while flagging complex ones for human review, reducing the manual workload for election officials.

“So what it does ultimately is it allows the easy stuff, so to speak, to be able to be processed automatically, which reduces the amount of work that they have to do. And as we've seen with this recent election, They were still able to get through quite a few, you know, a large amount of ballots in a relatively short amount of time.”

Speaker 4 · Hear it at 6:40

Mentioned

Companies
Pariscript, ACLU
Products
Newton
Also
Denver, Colorado, Oregon, Nevada, Florida

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Embedded.fm · 1h 03m

    339: Integrity of the Curling Club

    Dan Zimmerman, a computer scientist at Galois and Free & Fair, discusses the technical and political challenges of securing US elections. He explains End-to-End Verifiable (E2E-V) systems, the cryptographic basis of Microsoft's ElectionGuard, and the severe security flaws found in legacy voting machines like the Diebold AccuVote TS. Zimmerman argues that while internet voting is viable for low-stakes private elections (like his curling club), public elections require rigorous identity verification and auditability that current infrastructure lacks.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by EE Times Current. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.