157 - Design Inputs that Don't Suck, Risk Control Measures and Problems with Verification with Chuck Ventura

Let's Combinate · 9 Oct 2024 · 21m

What this episode covers

Chuck Ventura, founder of Ventura Solutions and CEO of HemoTek, explains why poor design inputs are a primary cause of delayed product development and verification failures in medical device and combination product projects. He advocates for spending 30% of project time on design inputs using concurrent engineering, where systems engineers collaborate with verification teams early to define clear acceptance criteria. Ventura also clarifies the structural relationship between user needs, risk controls, and design inputs, arguing that risk controls should serve as parent requirements to design inputs to ensure traceability and effective risk management.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 35m

    Building Your Design Controls (and Pitfalls to Avoid)

    Tom Rish, Director of Guru Services at Greenlight Guru, explains how to build effective design controls for medical devices by distinguishing between vague user needs and measurable design inputs. He argues that engineers should start from a clean slate rather than copy-pasting from previous Design History Files, as this prevents the solidification of tribal knowledge and leads to better designs. Rish emphasizes involving manufacturing, regulatory, and clinical teams early in the process to ensure the final product solves the actual clinical problem rather than just meeting arbitrary specifications.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 42m

    Determining User Needs for Your Medical Device

    Jesseca Lyons, a mechanical engineer and regulatory expert at Greenlight Guru, discusses the common pitfalls of defining user needs in medical device design controls. She explains how to distinguish true user problems from premature solutions using root cause analysis and emphasizes the importance of cross-functional input to identify who the actual users are. Lyons also clarifies the relationship between user needs and design inputs, noting that not every design input requires a corresponding user need and that design inputs should define performance requirements rather than specific solutions.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 32m

    V&V Activities from a Verification Engineer POV - How Hard Could It Be?

    Niki Price, a Medical Device Guru at Greenlight Guru with 15 years of experience, explains the critical distinction between design verification (testing design inputs) and design validation (testing user needs). She details the verification engineer's workflow, including managing complex trace matrices, writing protocols, and handling anomalies, while contrasting the inefficiencies of manual Excel-based systems with the automation of Greenlight Guru. Price highlights common pitfalls such as ambiguous requirements, version control errors, and the emotional toll of field failures, advocating for rigorous checks and balances in the design assurance process.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 58m

    #392: Verification and Validation in MedTech: A Practical Guide with Devon Campbell

    Devon Campbell, a medical device consultant, explains the critical distinctions between verification (did we build the product right?) and validation (did we build the right product?) for early-stage medtech companies. He emphasizes that strong, testable user needs and design inputs are prerequisites for successful V&V, warning that weak requirements lead to validation failures. Campbell advocates for pre-verification testing to refine protocols and manage sample sizes, ensuring that design reviews and traceability are robust before formal regulatory submission.

  • Being an Engineer · 43m

    Dakota Welker | User Needs, Design Inputs, Verification & Validation

    Dakota Welker, founder of Think MedTek, explains his four-phase product development methodology for medical device startups, emphasizing user needs, design inputs, verification, and validation. He details how he rescues stalled projects by clarifying scope and documentation, and describes a specific case where bringing manufacturing in-house and negotiating with multiple vendors reduced costs by 50%. Welker also discusses his transition from automotive and pneumatics to medical devices, his focus on CFD tools like Simscale, and the importance of balancing engineering rigor with client communication.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.