#362: Managing Risk in Clinical Investigations

Global Medical Device Podcast · 25 Apr 2024 · 39m · Episode 362

What this episode covers

Helene Quie, a medical device regulatory expert, explains the dual nature of risk management in clinical investigations, distinguishing between residual product safety risks and procedural risks inherent in study protocols. She emphasizes the need for measurable, data-driven benefit-risk assessments to satisfy ethics committees and competent authorities, particularly under the EU MDR. Quie highlights the operational challenges of enrolling vulnerable patient populations, such as children or acute patients, and the regulatory confusion surrounding the integration of AI in medical devices.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Let's Combinate · 41m

    059 - Literature Review, EU MDR CER’s, and Being Problem Driven with Ethan Drower

    Ethan Drower, Co-Founder of CiteMed, explains how his company uses software to streamline the literature review process for EU MDR Clinical Evaluation Reports (CERs). He details the shift from ad-hoc searches to rigorous, reproducible protocols required by notified bodies, emphasizing the need to track search results and maintain continuous risk-benefit assessments. Drower discusses the operational challenges of managing large portfolios of devices and the importance of validating software tools to ensure compliance and efficiency in regulatory submissions.

  • Let's Combinate · 24m

    161 - ISO 14971 and ICH Q9 EXPLAINED: Risk Management Frameworks in Medical Devices, Pharma and Combination Products

    Host Subhi Saadeh explains the distinct yet complementary roles of ISO 14971 and ICH Q9 in managing risk for combination products, highlighting how ISO 14971 focuses on patient safety through lifecycle management while ICH Q9 addresses broader pharmaceutical quality risks. He details the recent updates in ICH Q9 R1, particularly regarding managing subjectivity and scaling formality, and contrasts the structured, plan-driven approach of device risk management with the more collaborative, problem-driven nature of pharma risk assessments. Saadeh emphasizes critical concepts unique to ISO 14971, such as 'state of the art' for residual risk evaluation and the dual verification of implementation and effectiveness, which are essential for ensuring safety in complex drug-device combinations.

  • Let's Combinate · 1h 31m

    025 - “The Frying Pan to the Fire” with Edwin Bills

    Edwin Bills, a Risk Management Expert and former committee member for ISO 14971, ISO TR 24971, and AAMI TIR 105, explains the evolution of risk management standards in medical devices and combination products. He details the philosophical differences between ISO 14971 and ICH Q9, emphasizing that risk management must focus on patient safety rather than just regulatory compliance. Bills advises engineers to use qualitative methods early in development and highlights the importance of analyzing interactions between drug and device constituents in combination products. He also discusses the expanded requirements for post-market surveillance in the 2019 standard and the upcoming harmonization of ISO 14971 in Europe.

  • Let's Combinate · 40m

    091 - Combination Products Handbook Part 1: Foundation, Learning from the process, Case Studies and Book Q&A with Susan Neadle

    Susan Neadle, Principal Consultant at Combination Products Consulting Services LLC and author of The Combination Products Handbook, joins host Subhi Saadeh to discuss the book's creation, structure, and key technical content. They explore the challenges of coordinating multiple global experts to create an 'evergreen' resource that addresses the complexities of combination products, including injectors and on-body devices. Neadle details specific regulatory strategies, such as the integration of ICH Q9 and ISO 14971 for risk management, and the nuances of CGMPs under US and EU frameworks. The conversation highlights case studies, human factors testing, and post-market surveillance best practices derived from industry experience and FDA collaboration.

  • Let's Combinate · 40m

    098 - MedTech vs. Aerospace Risk Management, AFAP vs. ALARP/ALARA, Quantifying Benefit, Risk Control Measures, and Risk Management Reports with Bijan Elahi

    Bijan Elahi, a Technical Fellow and Medtronic corporate Advisor on safety risk management, explains the fundamental differences between MedTech and Aerospace risk management, noting that MedTech balances risk against benefit while Aerospace focuses on elimination. He details the challenges of quantifying risk using ISO 14971, advocating for quantitative methods over qualitative guesswork to provide objective evidence of safety. Elahi also discusses the regulatory requirements of the EU MDR, specifically the 'as far as possible' (AFAP) standard, and how companies determine when risk reduction is sufficient without adversely affecting the benefit-risk ratio.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Global Medical Device Podcast. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.