2 Key Areas Missing from FDA CDRH's Regulatory Science Priorities for 2020

Global Medical Device Podcast · 29 Jan 2020 · 37m · Episode 131

What this episode covers

Mike Drues, a subject matter expert from Vascular Sciences, joins host John Speer of Greenlight Guru to analyze the FDA CDRH's 2020 regulatory science priorities. Drues highlights that while eight priorities remain consistent with previous years, critical areas like reprocessing reusable devices and human factors/usability have been dropped, likely due to a lack of recent high-profile press coverage rather than resolved industry issues. The discussion emphasizes that the report is largely non-actionable and urges the medical device industry to develop its own prioritized lists to foster proactive, substantive dialogue with the FDA rather than waiting for reactive regulatory guidance.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Let's Combinate · 50m

    055 - "Critical Tasks and Knowledge Tasks" with Alexandra Benbadis

    Alexandra Benbadis, Usability Leader at Sanofi and former Senior Human Factors Consultant at Emergo by UL, explains the regulatory distinctions between critical and knowledge tasks in combination product human factors studies. She details how the FDA's CDRH and CDR definitions of 'harm' expand the scope of critical tasks to include compromised medical care, such as underdoses in maintenance medications, requiring rigorous residual risk commentary. Benbadis also describes the evolution of knowledge task protocols, specifically the two-part approach to evaluate Instructions for Use (IFU) findability and comprehension without requiring their use during initial open-ended questioning.

  • Let's Combinate · 35m

    079 - How FDA Reviews Combination Products, Policy, EPR's, and Harmonization with Rumi Young

    Rumi Young, Director of Regulatory Policy at Becton Dickinson (BD), explains how the FDA reviews combination products, drawing on her previous tenure as Acting Assistant Director in CDRH’s Division of Drug Delivery. She details the inter-center consult process for products like auto-injectors and smart connected devices, highlighting the manual nature of current submissions and the critical need for clear device identification in NDAs and BLAs. Young discusses the role of industry in shaping policy, advocating for updated Essential Performance Requirements (EPRs) and international harmonization through IMDRF to address the gap between evolving technologies and outdated guidances.

  • Let's Combinate · 34m

    258 - Combination Product Quality: Human Factors, CDMO Scorecards, ISO 14971 vs. ICH Q9, with Ben Locwin

    Ben Locwin, Vice President at Reliant Life Sciences, and Subhi Saadeh, Founder of Let's Combinate, discuss the divergent quality philosophies of pharmaceutical and medical device industries, focusing on combination products. They explain how human factors studies must account for different user types (HCP vs. lay) even with platform devices, and how CDMO scorecards often fail to reflect operational reality due to subjective weighting. The conversation details the differences between ISO 14971 and ICH Q9 risk management, emphasizing the need for FMEA as a living document updated with real-world data.

  • Let's Combinate · 36m

    104 -New FDA Guidance, HF vs. Design Validation, Critical Tasks & Pre-IND HF Studies with Sara McNew

    Sara McNew, Chief Scientific Officer at Design Science, discusses the new FDA Guidance on Human Factors for Combination Products, clarifying the distinction between human factors validation and broader design validation. She explains that pre-IND studies must demonstrate that clinical trial participants can use the device correctly to ensure accurate pharmacokinetic data, requiring a hybrid of formative and summative rigor. McNew details how critical task definitions now include administration and dosing errors, not just serious harm, and emphasizes the importance of submitting comprehensive Use Related Risk Assessments (URRA) alongside HF summaries.

  • Let's Combinate · 45m

    253 - FDA Is Making Big Changes to Its Inspection Approach

    Eric Pittman, former Bioresearch Monitoring West Division Director at the FDA and now VP at Project Farma, explains the FDA's transition from a specialized program-aligned inspection model back to a broader, medical-product-specific generalist model under the new Office of Investigations and Inspections (OII). He details the operational differences between routine inspections under Section 704 and undercover investigations under Section 702, emphasizing that investigators prioritize human subject safety over minor regulatory technicalities. Pittman advises industry to focus on the FDA’s Investigations Operations Manual (IOM) and specific compliance programs rather than cosmetic facility improvements, noting that the end of QSIT has shifted focus to broader process evaluation.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Global Medical Device Podcast. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.