055 - "Critical Tasks and Knowledge Tasks" with Alexandra Benbadis

Let's Combinate · 19 Oct 2022 · 50m

What this episode covers

Alexandra Benbadis, Usability Leader at Sanofi and former Senior Human Factors Consultant at Emergo by UL, explains the regulatory distinctions between critical and knowledge tasks in combination product human factors studies. She details how the FDA's CDRH and CDR definitions of 'harm' expand the scope of critical tasks to include compromised medical care, such as underdoses in maintenance medications, requiring rigorous residual risk commentary. Benbadis also describes the evolution of knowledge task protocols, specifically the two-part approach to evaluate Instructions for Use (IFU) findability and comprehension without requiring their use during initial open-ended questioning.

Mentioned

Companies
Sanofi, Emergo by UL
Products
Design of Everyday Things
Also
Tufts University, FDA, CDRH, CDER, IEC 62366, HG 75, Don Norman

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 40m

    Human Factors & Risk Management: What's Needed & Why?

    Shannon Hoste, President of Agilis Consulting Group and former lead of the FDA’s Human Factors Team, explains how human factors serves as a critical risk management activity for medical device development. She details the importance of the Use-Related Risk Assessment (URRA) in identifying potential use errors and high-disparity harms early in the design process to ensure safe and effective product use. Hoste discusses the evolution of ISO 62366, the challenges engineers face in understanding qualitative user needs, and the necessity of integrating human factors into the product development lifecycle rather than treating it as a late-stage compliance checkbox.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 36m

    Setting the Record Straight on Usability & Human Factors

    Mike Drues, a regulatory consultant for Vascular Sciences, joins host Jon Speer to clarify the distinction between usability and human factors in medical device development. They discuss how engineers often fail to test devices on actual end-users, leading to design flaws, and argue that FDA regulations are inconsistent, requiring extensive testing for simple devices while ignoring complex ones. The conversation emphasizes that usability testing should be risk-based, distinguishing between formative testing during development and summative testing after design freeze. Drues highlights the importance of realistic testing scenarios and warns against the 'tick-box' mentality that ignores off-label use risks.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 53m

    #450: Human Factors vs. Clinical Trials: Why Your MedTech Submission is Stalling

    Staci Miller, a Human Factors and UX Strategist at GenUX, explains why medical device submissions stall when human factors (HF) is treated as a late-stage box-checking exercise rather than an integrated part of ISO 14971 risk management. She distinguishes between Use-Related Risk Analysis (URRA) for novel devices and User Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (uFMEA) for established products with post-market data, emphasizing that clinical trial efficacy data cannot replace usability validation unless premeditated in the study protocol. Miller warns that ignoring the 'use environment' and design inputs leads to FDA rejections, as regulators require a cohesive safety story that maps user interactions across diverse contexts like ambulances or radiology suites.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 42m

    #323 The Combination Products Handbook

    Susan Neadle, principal consultant and president of Combination Products Consulting Services, discusses her peer-reviewed book, The Combination Products Handbook: A Practical Guide, published by CRC Press. Neadle explains how she collaborated with FDA officials, including John Barwiener, and industry experts from companies like Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, and Pfizer to create a consolidated resource for the complex niche of combination products. The episode details the book's structure, covering regulatory strategies, CGMPs, risk management, and human factors, while highlighting the challenges of harmonizing terminology between pharmaceutical and medical device sectors. Neadle emphasizes the importance of holistic thinking and integrated development to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance across global jurisdictions.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 34m

    Understanding and Handling Different Types of Feedback

    Isabella Schmitt, Director of Regulatory Affairs at Proxima Clinical Research, explains the regulatory distinctions between product feedback, complaints, and adverse events for medical device companies. She details the criteria for classifying complaints under 21 CFR 820, the strict timelines for filing Medical Device Reports (MDRs) with the FDA for deaths or serious injuries, and the importance of proactive monitoring via databases like MAUDE. Schmitt emphasizes that all staff must be trained to capture feedback to ensure qualified personnel can determine if an event requires investigation or root cause analysis.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Let's Combinate. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.