Most Common Problems Found During FDA Inspections in 2022

Global Medical Device Podcast · 23 Mar 2023 · 44m · Episode 311

What this episode covers

Mike Drues, President of Vascular Sciences, analyzes the FDA's 2022 inspection data to identify the most common reasons for Form 483s, highlighting CAPA, design controls, and complaint handling as the top three issues. He argues that these problems persist because companies focus on ticking regulatory boxes rather than understanding the underlying intent, often failing to perform adequate root cause analysis or document their quality management systems effectively. Drues emphasizes that medical device professionals must move beyond minimum compliance to prevent recurring errors and ensure patient safety through proactive prevention and rigorous validation.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Let's Combinate · 45m

    123 - Uncovering HUGE Quality Issues, Inspection Readiness in 2024, Data Integrity, AlCOA+/PIC/S and Critical Thinking in Quality Management with Peter Baker

    Peter Baker, President of Live Oak Quality Assurance and former FDA Drug Investigator, discusses his career uncovering data integrity breaches in overseas manufacturing facilities. He explains that 99% of data integrity issues stem from poor process design and 'right environment' failures rather than human error, urging companies to shift from compliance-focused checklists to quality-driven critical thinking. Baker highlights specific field failures, such as the manipulation of product quality by blending failed batches with passing ones, and emphasizes the importance of honest reporting of unknown discrepancies to ensure patient safety.

  • Let's Combinate · 25m

    155 - FDA Compliance Programs, Program 7536.000: CDER vs. CDRH led Inspections, Mock PAI's, Supplier Management, and What is a Manufacturer? with Laurie Auerbach

    Laurie Auerbach, President of Compliance Prodigies, LLC, explains FDA Compliance Program 7356.000, clarifying that contract manufacturers (CMOs) and component suppliers selling bundled solutions are legally defined as combination product manufacturers. She highlights common failures in mock Pre-Approval Inspections (PAIs), particularly the misconception that drug GMPs (21 CFR 211) and ICH Q10 fully satisfy device requirements under 21 CFR Part 4. Auerbach emphasizes that sponsors often fail to audit suppliers for device-specific elements like design control, risk management, and specific supplier controls, leading to critical gaps in quality agreements and inspection readiness.

  • Let's Combinate · 31m

    178 - CAPA Face-Off: Pharma vs. MedTech – Key Differences You Need to Know

    Aaron Snyder, founder of Quality Systems Explained and former VP of QA at Allotex, explains the regulatory and operational differences in CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) between pharmaceutical and MedTech industries. He highlights that while Pharma regulations (21 CFR 210/211) focus on 'deviations' and MedTech (21 CFR 820) mandates 'corrective and preventive action,' effective systems in both sectors perform similar root cause investigations. Snyder emphasizes that CAPA systems fail without strong management support, leading to 'birthday' CAPAs that remain open for years, and advocates for structured root cause tools like Ishikawa diagrams over manipulated 5 Whys.

  • Let's Combinate · 17m

    217 - 5 Fixable Problems Holding Back Drug–Device Programs

    Subhi Saadeh, founder of Let’s Combinate BioWorks, outlines five critical quality issues in drug-device combination products, drawing on his experience at Pfizer, Gilead, and Baxter. He addresses documentation misalignment in design transfer, late manufacturing input, arbitrary sampling plans, unclear method transfer ownership, and supplier qualification gaps. Saadeh proposes solutions such as integrating pharma change controls with device design plans, embedding DFM/DFA reviews, and adopting PPAP frameworks for component qualification. The episode emphasizes harmonizing drug and device development processes to ensure scalable, compliant, and patient-ready solutions.

  • Let's Combinate · 34m

    201 - Inside a $300M FDA Remediation, Lessons from Zimmer to EpiPen Warning Letters, 99.999% Reliability and Quality 4.0

    Jeff Gensler, a veteran quality executive, details his experience leading massive FDA remediation efforts at Zimmer Biomet and Pfizer’s Meridian Medical Technologies. He explains how his team managed a $300M remediation of 1,400 Design History Files (DHFs) at Zimmer and achieved 99.999% reliability for the EpiPen through rigorous CAPA processes and FDA negotiations. Gensler also discusses his transition to Kindeva Drug Delivery, where he oversaw a state-of-the-art facility buildout, and his current work founding the Quality 4.0 Consortium to help small and mid-sized pharma companies adopt digital quality systems like Electronic Batch Records (EBRs) and AI.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Global Medical Device Podcast. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.