[LIVE] How EU MDR Changes are Impacting the Medical Device Ecosystem

Global Medical Device Podcast · 22 Apr 2020 · 30m · Episode 143

What this episode covers

Jon Speer hosts a live discussion with Evangeline Loh, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Emergo Group, regarding the impact of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) on the medical device ecosystem. They detail critical regulatory shifts, including the delay of the EUDAMED database to 2022, the up-classification of self-certified Class I devices under Corrigendum 2, and the severe bottleneck caused by having only 11 designated Notified Bodies. The conversation highlights the strategic advantage of securing legacy MDD certification before May 2020 to avoid MDR compliance until 2024, while also addressing the regulatory duplication and market access challenges introduced by Brexit.

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Let's Combinate · 1h 29m

    015 - "Would You Use it on a Family Member?" with Monir El Azzouzi

    Monir El Azzouzi of Easy Medical Device explains the transition from the EU Medical Device Directive (MDD) to the Medical Device Regulation (MDR), highlighting the shift from self-certification to notified body oversight and the impact on private labeling. He details the structural differences between US FDA pathways (510k, PMA) and EU classification rules, noting that MDR requires full technical files for brand owners rather than just distributors. El Azzouzi also discusses the role of notified bodies, the conflict of interest preventing them from offering pre-submission guidance, and the importance of the 'would you use it on your family?' mantra in quality assurance.

  • Let's Combinate · 44m

    051 - "EU MDR" with Bassil Akra

    Bassil Akra, CEO of AKRA Team and former VP at TÜV SÜD, explains the implementation challenges of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745, focusing on the critical shortage of designated Notified Bodies and the resulting capacity constraints for manufacturers. He details the regulatory distinctions between Notified Bodies and Competent Authorities, clarifying that while Notified Bodies perform conformity assessments, Competent Authorities handle market surveillance and designate the bodies themselves. Akra specifically addresses Article 117 for drug-device combination products, explaining how manufacturers must obtain a Notified Body opinion on the device component if it lacks a CE mark, rather than a full certification, to support the medicinal product's market authorization.

  • Let's Combinate · 17m

    069 - EU MDR Extension with Michelle Lott

    Michelle Lott, founder of leanRAQA, explains that the EU MDR extension is not a simple delay but a conditional pathway for companies that have actively transitioned their quality systems. She details two routes to extend certificates: submitting to national competent authorities or obtaining derogation from notified bodies, both requiring proof of effort and capacity constraints. Lott highlights that over 50% of technical files are rejected initially and notes that notified bodies are now selective, preferring clients who are prepared and easy to work with.

  • Let's Combinate · 28m

    054 - "EUDAMED" with Richard Houlihan

    Richard Houlihan, CEO of Eirmed, discusses the history, structure, and compliance requirements of EUDAMED, the European Commission's medical device database. He details the system's six modules, highlighting the complexity of the clinical investigations module and the shift from private competent authority access to public transparency for device data. Houlihan explains the legal obligations for economic operators, including manufacturers, authorized representatives, and importers, emphasizing that EUDAMED is a mandatory cost of doing business in Europe with strict data validation rules.

  • Let's Combinate · 28m

    074 - Article 117, EU MDR extension, Notified Body Opinions, Timing and Interaction with Christiana Hoffman

    Christiana Hoffman, Executive Consultant at anteris medical GmbH and former TÜV SÜD expert, explains the regulatory framework for drug-device combination products under EU MDR Article 117. She details the requirement for Notified Body Opinions for products like prefilled syringes, the distinction between GMP and ISO 13485, and the strict prohibition on consulting during the assessment process. Hoffman also outlines the timeline challenges, noting that assessments can take 75 days plus response time, and advises manufacturers to start the process 6-12 months before their EMA submission.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Global Medical Device Podcast. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.