S1E06 First to file, secrecy, & fast-tracking patents | Tom Galvani

Being an Engineer · 13 May 2020 · 41m · Episode 6

What this episode covers

Tom Galvani, a patent attorney and founder of Galvani Legal, explains the mechanics of securing intellectual property for physical products, emphasizing the critical importance of secrecy before filing. He details the distinction between utility and design patents, the 'first to file' system, and how provisional applications can buy time for startups. Galvani also outlines the costs, timelines, and enforcement strategies associated with protecting inventions in the US market.

Most relevant to

founders before launch and early-stage companies

Topics

Mentioned

Companies
Galvani Legal, Pipeline Design & Engineering, Amazon
Also
Shark Tank

Other shows on the same ground, closest first.

  • Embedded.fm · 56m

    71: Dirty Your Mindscape

    Judith Szepesi, founding partner at HIPLegal, LLP, explains the strategic reasons for filing patents, distinguishing between using them as a 'sword' for enforcement, a 'shield' for defense, or a marketing tool. She details the patent application process, including the difference between provisional and utility filings, the 'first to file' rule, and the importance of prior art searches to ensure novelty and non-obviousness. The discussion covers the high costs of patent prosecution, the threat of patent trolls (Non-Practicing Entities), and strategies for startups to defend against litigation, such as joining defensive pools or seeking re-examination of questionable patents.

  • Product Startup · 23m

    229: Overview of Patenting for Hardware Startups

    Tom Dunlap, managing partner of Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig, explains the different types of intellectual property protection for hardware startups, including utility patents, design patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. He details the strategic use of provisional patents as a 'bookmark' to secure priority dates before public disclosure or fundraising, and clarifies the critical role of patent claims in defining the scope of protection. Dunlap also warns about the limitations of NDAs when working with overseas manufacturers and outlines the legal requirements for raising capital from friends and family.

  • Product Startup · 35m

    105: Patenting Physical Consumer Product Inventions

    Rich Goldstein, founder of Goldstein Patent Law, explains the strategic differences between utility and design patents, emphasizing that utility patents protect functionality through specific claims while design patents protect aesthetics. He advises inventors to file provisional applications carefully, as the priority date is only as good as the written disclosure, and to use continuation and continuation-in-part applications to maintain pending status for future improvements. Goldstein highlights the importance of aligning patent claims with marketable features to create valuable IP that prevents competitors from copying core innovations.

    6 chapters
  • The Hardware Entrepreneur · 28m

    #046 - When not to start a startup - how to license your idea (Part 2), with Stephen Key of inventRight, USA

    Stephen Key of inventRight explains how inventors can license ideas using a Provisional Patent Application (PPA) instead of launching a startup, arguing that PPAs provide sufficient protection against copycats in fast-moving markets. He details the steps for writing a strong PPA, including conducting prior art searches and defining unique points of difference, while warning against relying solely on patent attorneys who may have financial conflicts of interest. Key also shares lessons from his career, such as the importance of working for startups early on and using non-disclosure agreements when seeking external help to avoid co-ownership disputes.

  • Global Medical Device Podcast · 36m

    How Medical Device Intellectual Property Protection Varies by Sector

    Patent attorney Kevin Buckley, patent agent Neil Thompson, and Stephanie Willerth, CEO of Axolotl and Professor at the University of Victoria, discuss the divergent intellectual property strategies in academia versus the private medical device sector. They detail the process of filing disclosures at universities, the critical distinction between inventorship and ownership, and the financial implications of trade secrets versus patents for startups. The group advises on delaying major IP costs via provisional applications and PCT filings to preserve capital for product development.

The summary, chapters and topics are generated from the episode’s audio by this directory, not written by Being an Engineer. The episode itself belongs to its publisher.